In new book, Microsoft cautions humanity to develop AI ethics guidelines now

It’s 2038 and — like most businesses these days — a tech company is using artificial intelligence to scan job applicants.

In new book, Microsoft cautions humanity to develop AI ethics guidelines now - Carbon Free ServerThe system was trained with public employment records, an ostensibly unbiased dataset.

But even 20 years after sex-based discrimination was thrust into the media spotlight, the tech industry still hasn’t fully corrected its gender imbalance. The job screening system “learns” that most software engineers are men and starts favoring male candidates over women.

This dangerous scenario is one of many posited in “The Future Computed,” a new book published by Microsoft, with a foreword by Brad Smith, Microsoft president and chief legal officer, and Harry Shum, executive vice president of Microsoft’s Artificial Intelligence and Research group.

In new book, Microsoft cautions humanity to develop AI ethics guidelines now - Carbon Free Server (Microsoft Image)The book examines the use cases and potential dangers of AI technology, which will soon be integrated into many of the systems people use everyday. Microsoft believes AI should be developed with six core principles: “fair, reliable and safe, private and secure, inclusive, transparent, and accountable.”

Nimble policymaking and strong ethical guidelines are essential to ensuring AI doesn’t threaten equity or security, Microsoft says. In other words, we need to start planning now to avoid a scenario like the one facing the imaginary tech company looking for software engineers.

Microsoft suggests governments lead the way in establishing best practices for AI by integrating the technology into systems that serve the public. “While enabling more effective delivery of services for citizens, this will also provide governments with firsthand experience in developing best practices to address the ethical principles identified,” the book says.

Microsoft also suggests governments invest in better ways to make data public without connecting that data to individuals. AI relies on data — and large public datasets can be a useful tool in training the technology — but only if personal identifying information is protected.

“Additional research to enhance ‘de-identification’ techniques and ongoing discussions about how to balance the risks of re-identification against the social benefits will be important,” the book says.

But, Microsoft warns, governments shouldn’t go overboard. The book says regulators should avoid “rigid approaches” because not all personal information is equally sensitive and AI needs some identifying data, such as public health records, to achieve societal benefits.

Brad Smith, Microsoft president and chief legal officer, and Harry Shum, executive vice president of Microsoft’s Artificial Intelligence and Research group, wrote the foreword to ‘The Future Computed.’ (Microsoft Photo)Competitiveness is also a concern. AI needs data to learn and the keepers of the largest datasets in the world are a small handful of tech companies, Microsoft included. The book’s authors suggest government data as an antidote to this concern, allowing challengers to the Big Tech incumbents to feed their data-hungry AI systems.

“The question of the availability of data will arise most directly when one firm seeks to buy another and competition authorities need to consider whether the combined firms would possess datasets that are so valuable and unique that no other firms can compete effectively,” Microsoft says in the book.

Microsoft’s recommendations boil down to an ethical code, designed to ensure governments and technologists recognize the risks associated with AI and build the technology with safeguards in mind.

“In computer science, will concerns about the impact of AI mean that the study of ethics will become a requirement for computer programmers and researchers? We believe that’s a safe bet,” write Smith and Shum in the book’s forward. “Could we see a Hippocratic Oath for coders like we have for doctors? That could make sense.”

The book is available to download starting tonight, and will be released in the coming weeks on Amazon Kindle.

10 misconceptions regarding open source software

A lot of common misconceptions float around regarding open source software, not only amongst laymen, but among the software developer community as well. We’ve compiled the most prevalent pieces of misinformation and shall debunk them below.

#1 They aren’t protected under copyright

10 misconceptions regarding open source software - Carbon Free Server


They are. Open source software fall under the very same category of computer programming works, and as such, are protected just as much regarding their objective and source codes, moreover, their documentation, as custom developed or proprietary software are. The rights holders of FOSS software are thus afforded the same copyright, meaning that their consent is required for any and all use or utilisation of the software, not unlike any other computer programs.

#2 They may be used in any way

All FOSS software are governed under a given set of licence conditions, and may only be used and utilised in accordance with the restrictions and conditions on scope, mode, time and location regulated therein. Many different kinds of open source software licenses exist, which hold many various restrictions. The most prominent restriction in these licenses refers to how, and by what licence conditions may derivative works originating from the software be used (this is called viral effect).

#3 No licence conditions apply

This is one of the most often recurring misconceptions regarding FOSS software. More than 200 kinds of open source licences exist, and all give different types and lengths of licence rights. If we grouped them up into archetypes, we could separate five main categories:

10 misconceptions regarding open source software - Carbon Free Server1) Strong copyleft (e.g. GPL v2 and v3) – the strictest licence type, all versions of the software may only be used under the same licence.
2) Restricted copyleft (e.g. LGPL, MPL) – a licence type allowing more exceptions.
3) No copyleft (e.g. BSD, Apache) – the created software may be created under any licence.
4) FOSS with options (e.g. PerlArtistic) – the user may choose between various licence options regarding the created software.
5) FOSS with privilege (e.g. Netscape Public License) – utilisation rights are reserved by the author, with other rights able to be licensed to the user.

In the cases of all FOSS software, the licence criteria and conditions must be examined in order to ascertain available rights.

#4 Their developers are hobbyists

Many believe that open source software are developed by amateur developers at home, after work, as a hobby. While this statement may have been true 15-20 years ago, it no longer applies. As is the case with … software, there are certain FOSS software which are being developed by hobby developers, and there are those developed by professional enterprises. Software development firms often use FOSS licence conditions regarding their software, because the demand for these kinds of software continues to grow, and investors keep an eye out for startup companies such as these.

#5 They are free

10 misconceptions regarding open source software - Carbon Free Server


While a prevalent characteristic of open source software is them being free, this does not mean that certain supplementary functions, documentation or additional services can’t entail payment obligations, should the software development company in question not be satisfied with the base version of the open source software and the freely available documentation. It’s not excluded moreover for a software to be open source with licence fees applying simultaneously.

#6 Free and open source software are one and the same

This is partially true: not all open source software are free, and not all free software are open source. The two do not presume each other, proprietary software may be licensed free, and as seen above, it’s not unheard of to ask for a licence fee regarding FOSS software either.

#7 They are not safe

One cannot make the blanket statement that FOSS software are unsafe. As with custom made software, there are FOSS software which are safe and there are those which are not. With FOSS software, the principle of “more hands on deck” applies due to community development, making the chances of someone noticing and remedying a security risk substantially higher.

#8 That they may be used without risk

10 misconceptions regarding open source software - Carbon Free ServerOpen source software carry certain business and legal risks due to their licence conditions. For instance, the viral effect may occur in cases of some open source software, meaning that should derivative works be created, then those may only be published and licensed under the open source licence conditions. Different open source licences may also get entangled, as not all types are compatible with each other, as such, the use of many different FOSS software at once poses serious legal questions, the end of which may be the need to pursue substituting software because of the licence conditions being at odds with one another. Legal issues may also result from the tendency of open source software developers to disclaim their liabilities and warranties, making it impossible for the developing company to seek assistance in cases of errors, and having to “swallow” their resulting losses.

#9 FOSS software use will never be found out

It very well may. FOSS software rights holders have sufficient means to check whether or not a software contains open source software elements – even if these have been obfuscated. Similarly, any users using software such as these may request the company to reveal any open source software elements.

In the last ten years, there have been many whirlwind instances where developers were found to be using FOSS software without admitting this. This is how Fortinet was busted in Germany back in 2005, who have tried to hide the usage of open source software by coding, but D-Link and Skype have also been found out to be in violation of the GPL licence conditions.

#10 No harm can come of being found out

There haven’t been many cases yet in Hungary, where the violation of FOSS licence conditions were brought before court, but the tendency in West Europe is that an increasing number of similar cases get tried before a court of law. Should the courts ascertain the open source licence conditions being violated, they usually – pursuant to the plaintiff’s motion – go the whole nine yards in applying the legal consequences pertaining to copyright breaches; a part of which is a preliminary injunction denying the developer further FOSS software use, ordering all copies containing FOSS software to be withdrawn from sales and denying all future sales of the product. Moreover, there can be financial ramifications as well, with the violator being ordered to pay damages and to hand over unlawful profits achieved by misuse of the FOSS software. The largest blow may however be the ordering of the developer to reveal the entire software code containing the FOSS software, destroying several years’ worth of development and investment. Violating companies may also be ordered to issue a public apology, which may provide for a very inconvenient position to be in.

In conclusion: it is possible to develop software by utilising FOSS software with the careful study of licence conditions, but this requires a great deal of care and focus, and in all cases, the legal and business risks should be weighed appropriately.

The authors of the English version are Katalin Horváth and David Beraczkai members of the IT law department at Sár and Partners Attorneys at Law.

Vivaldi might just be the browser haven you were looking for

Vivaldi might just be the browser haven you were looking for - Carbon Free ServerVivaldi is targeted at power users and might just be the browser haven you were looking for. There are lots of nifty little features already built in, including tab previews and the ability to move tabs to any corner of the browser window. It has brilliant tab-management features, including a search box that lets you find an open tab by typing in keywords and a “tiling” view that lets you see several tabs side by side.


Web Technology

Built for the web, with the Web

One of the things that makes Vivaldi unique is that it is built on modern web technologies. We use JavaScript and React to create the user interface with the help of Node.js and a long list of NPM modules. Vivaldi is the web built with the web.

Edward Snowden: Here’s how we take back the Internet

Appearing by telepresence robot, Edward Snowden speaks at TED2014 about surveillance and Internet freedom. The right to data privacy, he suggests, is not a partisan issue, but requires a fundamental rethink of the role of the internet in our lives — and the laws that protect it. “Your rights matter,” he says, “because you never know when you’re going to need them.” Chris Anderson interviews, with special guest Tim Berners-Lee.

Richard Ledgett: The NSA responds to Edward Snowden’s TED Talk

After a surprise appearance by Edward Snowden at TED2014, Chris Anderson said: “If the NSA wants to respond, please do.”

And yes, they did.

Appearing by video, NSA deputy director Richard Ledgett answers Anderson’s questions about the balance between security and protecting privacy.

Think your email’s private?

Think again

Sending an email message is like sending a postcard, says scientist Andy Yen in this thought-provoking talk: Anyone can read it. Yet encryption, the technology that protects the privacy of email communication, does exist. It’s just that until now it has been difficult to install and a hassle to use. Showing a demo of an email program he designed with colleagues at CERN, Yen argues that encryption can be made simple to the point of becoming the default option, providing true email privacy to all.

Andy Yen is building an encrypted email program that lets everyone benefit from private communication.

Why you should listen
Andy Yen is a scientist at CERN. With two colleagues, Wei Sun and Jason Stockman, he co-founded ProtonMail, an encrypted email startup based in Geneva, Switzerland, that seeks to make secure email accessible. The group aims to advance internet security and protect online privacy rights by making it possible for everyone to incorporate encryption into their everyday communication.

A physicist and economist by training, since 2010 Andy has been part of the ATLAS experiment at CERN, where his research focus has been on searches for supersymmetric particles. He is translating his experience in large-scale computing to build the infrastructure that is used to run ProtonMail.

What others say
“It’s clear that we are under observation by both governments and corporations, and we can’t just sit on the sidelines — privacy is too important for democracy. We are computer scientists, we can do something, so we decided to try.” — Andy Yen

File-encrypting virus

File-encrypting virus - Carbon Free ServerDear Client,
Lately, viruses are spreading which encode files and they cannot be restored for use.
We vigorously ask you to regularly make saves of your important data to external data carriers (pendrive, CD, DVD, etc.) which, after saving, are removed from the computer and stored at a secure place.

Use antivirus systems! Try  ESET Online Scennert.

Vulnerability of WordPress 3.x version

Vulnerability of WordPress 3.x version - Carbon Free ServerWe kindly draw your attention that a very serious security gap emerged. All 3.x (from 3.0 to 3.9.2) WordPress version are affected. It enables that unauthorized persons run different codes placed in the comments on the website with the help of the administrator’s browser including the creation of administration access rights. Version 4.0 and above are not vulnerable.


1. If you use WordPress 3.x version.
As your webpage is vulnerable in thsi case, please update WordPress as soon as possible.
You can do this on WordPress administration surface using the link in the yellow line on the top.
2. If you do not use WordPress at the moment:
If you use WordPress in the future, please install the latest version and update it regularly.

We undertake the actualization. Contact us  HERE!